Jack Pack #11 - No Principles (en francais)

Jack's Pack #11

Joe, your logic just plain baffles me. In the spring you stated that the Liberals were "bordering on criminal" but yet you still voted for the Jack Pack agenda to prop them up.

Now it's "they have no principles", but we're going to do another deal with them anyways.

What would ever make you believe that a government "bordering on criminal", with "no principles" would honour any deal that you make?

How much of the $4.5 billion they promised last time has been spent? What are the plans for it? What is the specific date that this money will begin flowing?

Between you and the Liberals it's been announced and re-announced numerous times, with nothing to show for it. Smoke and mirrors. The problem is, the Liberals are much better at it than you are.

You just said it yourself, "They're survivors". They will do and say anything to hold on to power. To believe otherwise is to make a fool of yourself and the people you are supposed to be representing.

Christmas election not a given: NDP MP
Sun, November 6, 2005
By JOE MATYAS, Free Press Reporter

But the minority Liberals could carry on with NDP support, he said. "We're prepared to make this Parliament work . . . if the Liberals co-operate with us on holding the line on privatized health care."

Though NDP leader Jack Layton said yesterday he's not optimistic, Comartin said the Liberals may co-operate when "push comes to shove. They're survivors . . . They have no principles."